Guardians and conservators are individuals (often family members), companies or organizations appointed by a judge to make decisions for another adult that is incapacitated and unable to manage their finances, property, health care, or living arrangements. The EDI staff attorneys do not provide legal representation or legal advice to any party to a guardianship and/or conservatorship proceeding, including proposed guardians and/or proposed conservators, guardians, conservators, representative payees, protected persons, or any other interested parties. The EDI also answers questions from guardians, conservators, representative payees, protected persons, and other interested parties such as family members. The EDI provides training for proposed guardians and conservators and acts on civil judges’ referrals, including completing the statutorily required ten-year reviews of each guardianship and/or conservatorship case and investigating concerns either of the judge or interested parties. Guardians make necessary healthcare, residential, and minor financial decisions, and conservators make financial decisions for incapacitated adults with more complex estates. These are cases where adults have been found to lack the capacity to make decisions necessary to protect and keep themselves safe, and a judge has appointed another person – a guardian and/or a conservator – to make crucial decisions for the incapacitated adult, also known as the protected person. “In one month alone, we disabled more than half a million accounts for violating our child safety policies.The Second Judicial District Court’s Elder and Disability Initiative (“EDI”) is a program created to assist civil court judges with adult guardianship and conservatorship cases. “We use sophisticated technology, hire child safety experts, report content to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and share information and tools with other companies and law enforcement, including state attorneys general, to help root out predators. “Child exploitation is a horrific crime, and online predators are determined criminals. “We will of course preserve data consistent with our legal obligations,” said a Meta spokesperson. The New Mexico lawsuit follows a Guardian investigation in April that uncovered how Meta is failing to report or detect the use of its platforms for child trafficking. In the new filing, the attorney general said that Meta had informed its office that it intended to permanently delete these accounts within 30 days and that the company intends to only preserve evidence that it deems relevant to the lawsuit. no longer had access to data within those accounts.” It adds: “Meta’s disabling of these accounts prevents the state from continuing its investigation into Meta’s activities. This was “even though the accounts at issue had operated for months without action by Meta, and even though investigators had previously reported illicit and unlawful content to Meta through its reporting channels”, the document states. In the new court papers, Torrez said that one day after his office filed the lawsuit, Meta deactivated the accounts set up and used by investigators. The evidence collected, which Torrez claims includes child sexual abuse material, was cited in a lawsuit filed by the New Mexico attorney general’s office on 5 December, accusing Meta of enabling adults to find, message and groom children on Facebook, Instagram and Threads, and solicit them to sell pictures or participate in pornographic material.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |